From build–neglect–rebuild to maintain–improve–scale

On 4 November, Partners for Water convened Bangladeshi and Dutch partners in The Hague with two clear purposes: Identify opportunities and challenges for PPP in the water sector and make asset management the everyday operating system for water infrastructure in Bangladesh. The day was opened by Neeltje Kielen, Delegated Representative for Water in Bangladesh (Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands/RVO), and coordinated on the Dutch side by Michiel Slotema, Bangladesh Programme Advisor at Partners for Water (RVO). It moved from a morning of PPP scene-setting, pitches and a frank fishbowl discussion on early-stage risks to an early-afternoon milestone: a Strategic Partnership Arrangement (SPA) on Asset Management between Bangladesh’s Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR), the Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO).

Asset management as an operating system: Bangladesh and the Netherlands set the rules of the game.

Why this matters now

Bangladesh, until now a low-income country, will reach middle-income status in 2026. On current trajectories, it is expected to be the world’s 20th-largest economy by 2038 – a transition that raises the bar for infrastructure performance and financing. However, Bangladesh faces fiscal constraints, making it difficult to fund necessary infrastructure projects solely through public budgets. PPPs enable the leveraging of private capital to build critical infrastructure without immediately adding to the country’s debt burden. At the same time, this densely populated delta country is juggling climate extremes, upstream river dynamics, and fast urban and economic change. Too often, water assets fall into a build–neglect–rebuild (BNR) loop. Breaking it takes clear decision rules, reliable Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funding, data that drive choices, and governance that links national strategy to field results.

The day at a glance

• Morning – Opening & Embassy framing. Welcome by Neeltje Kielen. The embassy keynote highlights the urgency to take action and the potential opportunities.
• Late morning – PPP pitches + fishbowl. Three targeted pitches followed by a candid discussion on first-mile finance and risk.
• Lunch – Networking break.
• Early afternoon – Milestone. Signing of the SPA MoU to institutionalise asset management (MoWR–BWDB–RVO).
• Mid-afternoon – Scan & roadmap. Maturity assessment and plan for practical change within BWDB.
• Late afternoon – Incentives, governance, and the Official Development Assistance horizon. System fixes, inclusion, and how to sustain progress beyond concessional aid.

“We want partnerships and investment”

Fahim Faisal highlighted how PPP opportunities in wastewater, solid waste and sludge-to-value can advance only when early-stage risks are shared, data and feasibility are realistic, and Dutch and Bangladeshi partners jointly build pipelines rather than one-off projects. This was followed by Hasan Abdullah Towhid, Counsellor and Head of Chancery, Embassy of Bangladesh in The Hague, who highlighted both the urgency to take action and the potential opportunities. He underlined climate exposure and paired it with a practical request: technology transfer, knowledge-sharing, and investment via PPPs rather than traditional aid:

“We don’t want more aid… we want technology transfer, knowledge sharing, best practices and investment in terms of profit and public-private partnership.”

With a young workforce and strong engineering talent, his message was simple: the window for value-creating partnerships is now!

Three pitches: practical PPP pathways

Three short pitches highlighted PPP opportunities.

Royal HaskoningDHV – lessons from engagement in PPP and long-term presence in Bangladesh. The team explored how to turn the question of ‘what next’ after treatment into creating value by reusing effluent and sludge with real off-takers. Project Manager Sheila Carvalho explained: “Our project focuses on two components: the feasibility of wastewater post-treatment for Chattogram, and viable reuse of effluent and sludge.”

SNV – PPP in Cumilla and work on small PPPs. SNV standardises bite-size, multi-year PPP contracts (often around 10-year lease/management models) with Integrated Municipal Information System (IMIS)-backed tracking so capacity comes first, scale second. Ismène Stalpers, Country Director Bangladesh explained: “We realised very quickly we needed to start at the ground level.”

SweepSmart – PPP in waste and drainage management. SweepSmart pairs drainage upgrades with mixed-waste processing to recover materials and generate Refuse-Derived Fuel revenues. Founder Niels van den Hoek: “Financial viability is concern number one, two and three.”

Fishbowl: the “first-mile” financing gap

The fishbowl discussion soon narrowed to the same hard edge: early-stage risk.

Don Offermans, an independent advisor who has watched plenty of deals wobble, put it bluntly: “You can take four steps successfully and fail on the fifth – and lose all your money.” Léon Weisscher from Invest International drew the line where their capital really starts to move: “Pre-feasibility is often too early for us. We typically fund full feasibility when there’s a clear line of sight to implementation… Development accelerators and export solutions can help, as long as there’s Dutch content.”

Developers can’t build up their Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) capacity for just one small project as they need portfolios, not one-off jobs. How can they work around this? By teaming up across Europe, for example via a Dutch-Danish consortia to satisfy content rules, while plugging capability gaps, and stacking revenue levers where possible: carbon credits on one side, municipal co-finance on the other.

By the end, there was a simple, unanimous core message: spread the first-mile risk between public and private, build pipelines instead of projects, and weave in local finance from day one.

The big moment: a milestone MoU

After lunch, it was time for the day’s milestone: the signing of a new Strategic Partnership Arrangement (SPA) on Asset Management between the Ministry of Water Resources, the Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO). The SPA MoU structures cooperation at three levels: implementation (participatory in-polder water management), institution (BWDB’s shift from reactive O&M to proactive asset management), and policy (alignment with the Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100, including steps toward more predictable O&M financing).

Joining from Dhaka, Dr Robin Biswas (BWDB) signed online while Michiel Slotema (RVO/Partners for Water) signed in the conference room. Dr Biswas, an experienced river management specialist and long-time advocate of participatory water governance, called it “a very good moment,” signalling a move “from a reactive to a proactive approach.” He also stated the constraint plainly: “This year, the O&M budget requirement was 130 billion Taka (€915M), but the allocation was only 10 billion Taka (€70M). He explained that most of that is spent on emergency works.” On the cultural hurdle, he added: “It’s the tragedy of the commons – everyone benefits from water, but no one takes responsibility for operation and maintenance.”

The SPA MoU also matters beyond the signatures: it codifies roles, decision rules and funding pathways so that asset management becomes business as usual rather than an add-on – linking day-to-day maintenance, data and budgets to the outcomes the Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100 demands.

From scan to roadmap: what needs to change within BWDB

Asset management specialist Dr Hala Alhamed presented a structured maturity self-assessment (adapted from the International Infrastructure Management Manual and tailored to BWDB). Ten fields – from strategy and service levels to data, finance, risk and governance – were rated and distilled into various initiatives.

This is what the self-assessment revealed:

• Decisions are not tied to outcomes; priorities change.
• Budgeting is centralised and lacking evidence; it slows routine O&M.
• The organisation is engineering-strong but weak in finance, data, and process capabilities.
• Data exists but it isn’t embedded in approvals, procurement and planning.
• The problem can’t be solved by raising user fees. First, get the management and data right; then talk about fees.

What the roadmap proposes:

• Create an outcome-based decision framework linking O&M/capex to clear criteria.
• Embed asset management in workflows; clarify HQ-district roles; cut approval lag.
• Treat the AM plan as a project; evolve to a single “source of truth” for assets/data.
• Put together a multidisciplinary core team (engineers + finance + analytics + process).
• Start where ownership exists, learn fast, then scale.

Incentives make the system move; governance keeps it honest

Rubaiyath Sarwar (Innovation Consulting) mapped demand, supply, support services and rules (formal and informal) around embankments, gates, dredging, monitoring and maintenance. Two points stood out: money shapes behaviour, and longevity must be rewarded.

On governance and inclusion, Pim de Beer (IOB) reflected on Dutch policy evaluations: upfront system analysis is often missing; designs follow policy templates more than system needs; the sustainability of results is rarely monitored post-project.

Hero Heering (MetaMeta) argued for water management “for a purpose”: pair infrastructure with agricultural value so that users have a reason to maintain it. Set up decentralized emergency O&M funds with clear triggers to stop small issues becoming failures while central budgets move.

Melvin van der Veen (Both ENDS) put power back in the picture: “This is about governance: who is involved in decision-making?” He cited Tidal River Management (TRM) with UTTARAN and the Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS), where communities and local government co-designed a basin plan which engineers modelled and iterated – along with compensation for landless people during TRM cycles.

These were the connecting themes throughout discussions:

• Make inter-agency collaboration (BWDB, Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE), Local Government Engineering Department (LGED) and others, routine.
• Work at hydrological scales where possible.
• Honour O&M agreements so that community routines are matched by timely government action on larger works.

Five concrete next moves

1. Use the decision framework in the next budget cycle; publish criteria tied to outcomes and document trade-offs for Planning and Finance.
2. Pilot two emergency O&M facilities in selected polders with clear triggers, caps and reporting.
3. Mandate a core asset team (engineers + finance + data + process) to simplify, standardise and drive adoption.
4. Wire one data tool into one approval (e.g., procurement must reference the asset register) and retire parallel spreadsheets.
5. Prototype a longevity incentive: recognize teams and projects that extend asset life beyond design.

These moves are small on their own but together they can change daily decisions.

Looking past Official Development Assistance (ODA)

As Bangladesh advances toward middle-income status, concessional aid will taper. Safeguards proposed by participants: a light-touch TA tail so institutions keep learning after projects close; bridging mechanisms (revolving or outcome-based where appropriate) that carry O&M improvements beyond project timelines; training at scale (e.g. with World Water Academy) to professionalise asset management across agencies; and system monitoring that outlives programmes (fault response times, maintenance cycles, service levels – not just project KPIs).

What Partners for Water can uniquely add

Four roles crystallised:

• Convene (ministries, BWDB, local government, civil society, financiers, Dutch and EU expertise).
• Sequence (scan → roadmap → pilots → scale) to fit institutions.
• Codify what works (model MoUs, WMO agreements, decision framework, simple templates.
• Connect Dutch and EU capability with Bangladeshi ownership so portfolios rather than pilots emerge.

Closing note

The SPA MoU gave the afternoon its milestone. The scan, roadmap, as well as the finance and governance debates gave it direction. In Dr Robin’s words, be “proactive.” In Rubaiyath Sarwar’s, “reward infrastructure that lasts.” Put together, they create a practical recipe to make the build–neglect–rebuild cycle the exception, not the norm, one budget cycle and one maintenance round at a time.

Audience questions and attendees’ ‘homework’ tips and ideas for the moderators kept the debate going through the well-catered end-of-day reception.

Read more about initiatives to break the BNR cycle in Bangladesh here.